The Yorkshire Coast

Collins portrays this setting as a haunted place with a defunct feel to it. Collins uses lots of different melancholy words such as ‘shivering and trembling’ and ‘lonesome and horrid’ to give us the sense of sadness and a sense that this place has been deserted and is not loved. This overall gives us the impression that this place is still stained by something that might of happened to it long ago.

Collins displays that no children play in this part of the yorkshire coast. Having Collins portray ‘no children…ever come to play here’ gives this part of the yorkshire coast a melancholy feel because no children playing here means no joy because kids are always joyous. This gives the feeling that this place is not for the younger members of society and doesn’t have many people living near it.

 

 

 

Pip and Ishmael

Neither Pip or Ishmael had a dominant super ego in their lives. Pip never knew his parents and ultimately parents are the ones who create the super ego in that they tell you what is and isn’t acceptable, ‘As i never saw my mother or father’. Ishmael ignored all super ego in his life and went to sea alone when everyone said that he should stay get a job all the usual things that men should have done back then.

 

On the contrary they are also different in some ways. For example Melville suggests  Ishmael hates the company of other people and just wants to be isolated ‘ It is a way I have of driving off the spleen’, whereas Pip is shown by Dickens hating  being alone and just wants to be with people yet he finds himself on his own without those people around him and wants to have someone there for him.

 

There is a big age difference between the two characters. Ishmael is shown by Melville as an old man who has seen lots of the world and has had loads of people tell him what to do (super ego)and has experienced it in lots of different ways ‘some years ago, never mind how long’, whereas Dickens portrays Pip as just a young boy ‘infant tongue’ who is happy to be alive he only has one view of the world and that is standing in his overgrown place not knowing where he is and why he is there.

 

Difference between the two scenes

These two openings to the play Macbeth are very different openings in many different ways. First of all the settings of both the versions are very different. For the first version the opening was held on a beach and for the second it was held in a hospital ward. I think that being set on a beach made the opening less creepy and sinister as the witches are meant to be. However having the opening in the ward having the witches as nurses was very effective. This made them able to do a whole range of really sinister stuff. This made the whole of the opening of the play much creepier because the witches were killing people and also they took out his heart and made a pretend man with it. The witches in the first one were very stereotypical nurses being old and wrinkly however they still were quite weird as a witch should be.

 

Another difference between the two versions was how modern they were. The first version you could tell was quite old fashioned because there weren’t many special effects however in the second version it was much more modern with very effective special effects. For instance the lighting was extremely effective in the modern one as it built the atmosphere for the witches and mainly had the witches in the dark. Another good special effect was the sound effects. Sound is the key to tension. The music had a brilliant crescendo as the light was going down onto the witches which tells the people watching that something major is going to happen.

There are much more special effects and lighting and sound in the second, more modern scene which I think makes a big difference and contrast to the first scene as it makes us more tense when we are watching it and also makes the play more spooky.

In what ways could a view from the bridge be viewed as a tragedy?

Firstly when we look at a play and see if it could be viewed as a tragedy we compare it to a more ancient kind of tragedy such as Greek tragedy. When we look at a view from the bridge against greek tragedy we try and find similarities. There is always a narrator or a chorus in a Greek tragedy who is the link between the audience and the actors in the play, in ‘a view from the bridge’ our link is Alfieri who acts as the narrator. He at all times almost steps out of the play and talks to us and is just as helpless as us in trying to stop this tragedy from happening.

 

What I found is that in tragedies you almost know what is going to happen at the end of the tragedy because there are clues throughout the play and also Alfieri as the link almost tells us what is going to happen, ‘I knew where he was going to end’ but he couldn’t do anything. The question always is how is it going to happen and what are they doing it for. In this instance Eddie does it because he doesn’t want to lose Catherine.

 

The one main thing that all tragedies have in common is greed. For instance in the view from the bridge Eddie is extremely greedy in that he wants to have Catherine all to himself when she is a grownup girl and she wants to be doing stuff for herself. Eddie however is dodgy about her getting a job and as soon as she falls in love he starts emasculating that man and finding reasons for them not to be together. ‘Go baby bring in the supper’, he is constantly calling her a baby and acting as though she is still his little child when actually she has grown up.

 

One of the main tragedies is that the family get split up so dramatically after the arrival and partly because of the arrival of the cousins. There is a final moment the night of the cousins arrival when the family are all together and happy for the last time ‘First Beatrice smiles, then Catherine’. This turns out to be the last time they are not fighting and there is actually peace.

 

In this play Beatrice loses two things. One is that she loses her husband and what she is left with is nothing because now her husband is gone she is living alone because Rodolpho and Catherine want to go live someplace on their own. She also just loses her whole family because Catherine has gone to live with her husband and Eddie’s gone and her cousin Marco has been sent back to Italy because of Eddie and she has lost all of her friends because of what Eddie has done, so basically she has lost everything because of Eddie.

 

Catherine has lost from this play her father figure who has been with her throughout her whole childhood. Because she had lost her family from very early on in her life and Eddie and Beatrice took her on they were a real family and they felt like a family to her. So when Eddie does all these terrible things and he eventually dies she loses another father figure and ultimately her family falls apart.

 

Of course the tragedy is based around what Eddie has lost and his tragic fall in life but we can’t forget all the other people who lose things. Louis and Mike lose their best friend, Marco ultimately may lose his family because now he has to go home he cannot make the money that he needs to to keep his family eating and after all that is the reason that he came to America in the first place. The only person that doesn’t really lose anything is Rodolpho because he came over to America to get an American passport and to start a life here. He is able to get his American passport and he has got this because he is marrying the love of his wife so he is the only person that doesn’t lose anything.

So a view from the bridge can be viewed from as a tragedy because of all the link it has with the Greek tragedies and the character traits that are shown throughout.

2 paragraphs on Eddie and his character

Miller portrays Catherine’s love for Eddie even through all his selfish behaviour. She explains to Rodolpho, ‘ he was good to me’. Catherine appreciates everything Eddie has done for her however she confesses to Rodolpho, ‘ I’m afraid of Eddie here.’ This shows that even she understands that he has a dark side and sometimes he might not be able to control what he is doing.

Miller portrays tension in almost everything Eddie does in act 1. The biggest moment of tension is however between Marco and Eddie and not Rodolpho. When Marcos says,’ Can you lift this chair?’ As soon as Marco has said this Eddie feel an immediate threat to his masculinity so says’ Sure why not?’ However once Eddie has tried and failed and Marco succeeds, it is obvious that Miller is having payback on Eddie for all the times he has emasculated Rodolpho. Finally the last stage direction of act 1,’ Eddies’s grin vanishes as he absorbs his look’. Miller is telling us that there is a new dominant male now and that Marco has control over Eddie.